What was being solved.
An ecommerce environment had rising AWS spend, incomplete allocation and performance pressure during demand peaks. The client’s name and billing data are kept private.
How the engagement was structured.
Usage and ownership review
Mapped EC2, storage, data-transfer and service ownership before recommending changes.
Rightsizing and commitment candidates
Separated immediately reversible sizing changes from longer-term commitment decisions.
Storage and delivery path
Reviewed unused storage, lifecycle policy, caching and CDN opportunities as separate implementation items.
Operating follow-through
Attached owners and acceptance checks to changes so a lower bill did not become the only success condition.
What we can share.
We keep this client’s name and billing figures private, so there is no savings percentage here. The team came away with a ranked list of changes, each with an owner and an acceptance check, so cost work did not come at the expense of reliability at peak.